RTX A2000 vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti [4

您所在的位置:网站首页 a2000 3050ti RTX A2000 vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti [4

RTX A2000 vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti [4

#RTX A2000 vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti [4| 来源: 网络整理| 查看: 265

RTX A2000 vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Contents General info Technical specs Memory Benchmarks Gaming Cast your own vote User ratings: view and submit Questions and comments RTX 3060 Ti RTX A2000 General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking29109Place by popularity9no dataValue for money62.6532.95ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2022)Ampere (2020−2022)GPU code nameAmpere GA104GA106Market segmentDesktopDesktopRelease date1 December 2020 (2 years old)10 August 2021 (1 year old)Launch price (MSRP)$399 $449 Current price$391 (1x MSRP)$478 (1.1x MSRP) Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 3060 Ti has 90% better value for money than RTX A2000.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48643328Core clock speed1410 MHzno dataBoost clock speed1665 MHz1200 MHzNumber of transistors17,400 million13,250 millionManufacturing process technology8 nm8 nmPower consumption (TDP)220 Watt70 WattTexture fill rate253.1124.8 Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16Length242 mm167 mmWidth2-slot2-slotSupplementary power connectors1x 12-pinNone Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6Maximum RAM amount8 GB6 GBMemory bus width256 Bit192 BitMemory clock speed14000 MHz12 GB/sMemory bandwidth448.0 GB/s288.0 GB/sShared memory-no data Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort4x mini-DisplayPortHDMI+no data API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)Shader Model6.56.6OpenGL4.64.6OpenCL2.03.0Vulkan1.21.2CUDA8.68.6 Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3060 Ti 52.77 +50.1% RTX A2000 35.15

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti outperforms RTX A2000 by 50% in our combined benchmark results.

Passmark

This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 3060 Ti 20626 +50.1% RTX A2000 13741

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti outperforms RTX A2000 by 50% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

RTX 3060 Ti 108599 +49.4% RTX A2000 72691

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti outperforms RTX A2000 by 49% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

RTX 3060 Ti 95490 +36.2% RTX A2000 70130

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti outperforms RTX A2000 by 36% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

RTX 3060 Ti 128321 +52.8% RTX A2000 84002

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti outperforms RTX A2000 by 53% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD127no data 1440p83no data 4K53no data Performance in popular games

Full HDLow Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 83 no data

Full HDMedium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 121 no data Assassin's Creed Valhalla 95 no data Battlefield 5 145 no data Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 140−150 no data Cyberpunk 2077 81 no data Far Cry 5 125 no data Far Cry New Dawn 107 no data Forza Horizon 4 200 no data Hitman 3 160−170 no data Horizon Zero Dawn 139 no data Red Dead Redemption 2 154 no data Shadow of the Tomb Raider 98 no data Watch Dogs: Legion 122 no data

Full HDHigh Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 104 no data Assassin's Creed Valhalla 81 no data Battlefield 5 124 no data Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 140−150 no data Cyberpunk 2077 78 no data Far Cry 5 119 no data Far Cry New Dawn 102 no data Forza Horizon 4 196 no data Hitman 3 160−170 no data Horizon Zero Dawn 116 no data Metro Exodus 69 no data Red Dead Redemption 2 89 no data Shadow of the Tomb Raider 94 no data The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 125 no data Watch Dogs: Legion 109 no data

Full HDUltra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75 no data Assassin's Creed Valhalla 74 no data Battlefield 5 114 no data Cyberpunk 2077 77 no data Far Cry 5 111 no data Far Cry New Dawn 92 no data Forza Horizon 4 173 no data The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65 no data Watch Dogs: Legion 77 no data

1440pHigh Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 90−95 no data Hitman 3 100−110 no data Horizon Zero Dawn 92 no data Metro Exodus 45 no data Red Dead Redemption 2 57 no data Shadow of the Tomb Raider 79 no data

1440pUltra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65 no data Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60 no data Battlefield 5 98 no data Cyberpunk 2077 52 no data Far Cry 5 94 no data Far Cry New Dawn 86 no data Forza Horizon 4 150 no data Watch Dogs: Legion 59 no data

4KHigh Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55 no data Hitman 3 55−60 no data Horizon Zero Dawn 53 no data Metro Exodus 34 no data Red Dead Redemption 2 38 no data Shadow of the Tomb Raider 52 no data The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 63 no data

4KUltra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45 no data Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40 no data Battlefield 5 65 no data Cyberpunk 2077 25 no data Far Cry 5 56 no data Far Cry New Dawn 58 no data Forza Horizon 4 103 no data Watch Dogs: Legion 33 no data

All in all, in popular games:

Advantages and disadvantages Performance score 52.77 35.15 Recency 1 December 2020 10 August 2021 Cost $399 $449 Memory bus width 256 192 Pipelines / CUDA cores 4864 3328 Memory bandwidth 448 288 Power consumption (TDP) 220 Watt 70 Watt

Based on the results of synthetic and gaming tests, our recommendation leans towards the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti due to its superior performance when compared to the RTX A2000 graphics card.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your own vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti RTX A2000 Like Like Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Radeon RX 6750 XT RTX A2000 vs Radeon RX 5600 XT GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Radeon RX 6700 XT GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs GeForce RTX 3090 SUPER User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.3 8073 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

3.6 289 votes

Rate NVIDIA RTX A2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.

Graphics settings Screen resolution FPS


【本文地址】


今日新闻


推荐新闻


CopyRight 2018-2019 办公设备维修网 版权所有 豫ICP备15022753号-3